Comment: Shot-clock comes with questions, but at least the questions are new
Tennis has introduced something controversial in shot-clock. It naturally comes with questions, but Michael Graham wonders since when has that been a bad thing?
Sometimes, you have to feel sorry for the law-makers in sport. They are just never going to please everyone.
A couple of weeks ago, Kevin Anderson’s epic Wimbledon semi-final against John Isner prompted talk of introducing deciding set tiebreakers at All-England club.
Some where excited by the proposal, some were disgusted. Thus it always is.
This week, a new debate is gripping tennis. As with anything new, there are always questions. Is the introduction of the shot-clock going to improve the game, or ruin it?
North American tournaments will use the controversial new system in the build-up to the US Open, where they will be used on the biggest stage for all to see.
In short, players will be held-accountable on-court for violating the 25-second time limit to deliver their serve. Everyone seems to have an opinion.
However, drill down into it and you quickly learn that no one commenting is actually talking about tennis at all. Whether or not the shot-clock will benefit tennis couldn’t be further from their minds. All they care about is whether or not the shot-clock will benefit them.
“I think it’s a good thing,” says Alexander Zverev, before going into a subtle and well-disguised rant about players who attempt to slow the game down to disrupt the rhythm of quicker players. The German is one of the quickest players on the circuit.
“Without a shot clock, that would have been a three-hour match,” said Andy Murray after he beat Makenzie McDonald in the first round of the Washington Open.
“It’s a positive change for tennis.”
Well, yes it is, Andy, especially if you’re the wrong side of 30 and coming back from a long injury that has left your fitness lagging behind rivals. Then shorter matches are definitely a good thing.
Meanwhile, Novak Djokovic isn’t happy about it. That’st he Novak Djokovic famed for mental gamesmanship and an obsessive need to bounce a ball several dozen times before he throws it up in the air, in case you were wondering.
“Everybody is trying to get this new generation of people and the attention span is not maybe as it used to be, except if you’re a real, real tennis fan.”
Rafael Nadal has also gone down the ‘you don’t understand and appreciate tennis enough if you want shot-clock’ route too.
“If you want to see a quick game without thinking, well done,” he said.
“If you want to keep playing in a sport that you need to think, you need to play with more tactics, you want to have long and good rallies, then of course you are going the wrong way.”
— Tennis365 (@T365Official) July 23, 2018
So, nothing at all to do with the strict OCD-tastic lengthy pre-serve routine he goes through on every single, point, then?
The point is that everyone has an agenda, but the real question of whether the shot-clock is good for tennis is being lost in the scramble of player self-interest.
And, the truth is, that we just don’t know yet. There are pros and cons on either side of the debate but, like the introduction of VAR into football, we just won’t know until we try it.
Nadal and Djokovic may well be right. It will obviously reduce thinking time for the more cerebral players. From a spectator point of view, that may be a good thing, though.
Instead of seeing how opponents try to counter their court smarts, we can see how the cerebral players counter the talents of more instinctive players.
Andy Murray may be right too, in saying that shorter matches will make for a better spectacle.
However, when he’s back on an even keel, fitness-wise, and has returned to his brilliant best and putting on masterclasses in defence every week, will he be so keen to face people who can conserve their mental energy better thanks to the shot-clock?
Ultimately, we just don’t know, but that’s what will make it fun.
Yes, shot-clock comes with a lot of questions, but at least they are new questions, and that definitelyis good for tennis.
How to watch Masters finals in Toronto and Montreal
How to track the Canadian Open action.
Simona Halep to return to top ten after reaching Toronto final
Simona Halep and Beatriz Haddad Maia will battle it out for the Toronto Masters title.
Dan Evans battles bravely but Pablo Carreno Busta sets Hubert Hurkacz showdown
The British number two was eventually outlasted 7-5 6-7 6-2 across two hours and 58 minutes.
Andy Murray gets Cinccinati boost, but handed tricky opener against old foe with Cameron Norrie also lurking
Andy Murray handed tough assignment in Cincinnati.
Dan Evans vs Pablo Carreno Busta: How to watch Montreal semis as Evans looks to sneak into ATP top 20
A quick lowdown on the Canadian Masters semi-final and possible ATP Ranking changes.
Rafael Nadal ‘happy to be in Cincy’ as he finds out his path to possible glory at ATP Masters 1000 event
Rafael Nadal good to go in Cincinnati.
Nick Kyrgios ‘doesn’t care’ about records as he admits parents’ illness and fatigue are weighing him down
Nick Kyrgios not concerned about his winning streak coming to an end as he is more worried about his parents.
ATP Cincy draw: Daniil Medvedev and Nick Kyrgios could meet again, Dan Evans in line to face Stefanos Tsitsipas
This way for the draw of the 2022 Western & Southern Open in Cincinnati.
Simona Halep ‘stays strong mentally’ to hold off ‘super nice and future Grand Slam champion’ Coco Gauff
Simona Halep overcomes edgy second set to beat Coco Gauff.
WTA Cincinnati draw: Emma Raducanu to face Serena Williams in dream opening match
The Cincy draw has dished up a big one: Emma Raducanu vs Serena Williams